If you’ve ever tried to manifest a specific person — a partner, a friend, a client, even a long-lost cousin — you’ve probably run into that question:
“Wait… am I messing with their free will?”
It’s a conversation that splits the manifestation community right down the middle. On one side, you’ve got the “everything is you pushed out” crowd, citing Neville Goddard’s teachings that the people in your reality are simply reflections of your own consciousness. On the other, you’ve got the “don’t play puppet master” camp, warning that trying to bend someone else’s choices to your will is ethically murky.
So… who’s right?
🧠 The Science & Philosophy of Choice
Neuroscience muddies the waters. Benjamin Libet’s famous experiments in the 1980s showed that the brain initiates actions milliseconds before we consciously decide to act — suggesting that “free will” might be more of a post-game commentary than a play-by-play decision.
Philosophers have been arguing about this for centuries. Determinists say everything is cause-and-effect, meaning your “choices” are just the inevitable result of prior events. Libertarians (the philosophical kind, not the political party) argue that we do have genuine agency.
Quantum physics adds another twist: experiments suggest there’s no single, fixed “objective reality”. If reality is subjective and consciousness plays a role in shaping it, then influencing someone through your focus might not be “taking” their free will — it might just be shifting the version of them you experience.
✨ The Law of Attraction Lens
From a manifestation perspective, there are two main schools of thought:
1. “They Have No Free Will in Your Reality”
Neville Goddard’s Law of Assumption says the people in your life can only show up as a reflection of your dominant beliefs about them. In this view, you’re not overriding their will — you’re aligning your inner state so that the version of them who matches it appears in your experience.
2. “Respect Their Autonomy”
Others argue that even if reality is subjective, it’s still ethically important to avoid trying to control another person’s feelings or actions. They see manifesting a specific person as potentially manipulative, especially if it overrides their current desires.
⚖️ The Ethics Question
Here’s the uncomfortable truth: both sides have a point.
- If you believe reality is a mirror, then “changing” someone is really about changing yourself.
- If you believe people are separate agents with their own paths, then trying to script their behavior can feel like crossing a line.
The real question becomes: What’s your intention?
Are you trying to force a specific outcome from a specific person, or are you aligning yourself with the qualities and experiences you want — and letting the right person embody them?
📊 What the Data Suggests
- People with a strong sense of personal agency report higher life satisfaction (APA).
- Visualization and mental rehearsal can influence not just your own behavior, but how others perceive and respond to you (Harvard studies on mirror neurons).
- Social psychology shows that expectations can create self-fulfilling prophecies — the “Pygmalion effect” — where people unconsciously rise (or sink) to meet the energy you project.
💡 So… Should You Care or Just Go For It?
Here’s the bottom line:
- If “manifesting them” means obsessively trying to bend their will, you’re likely creating resistance — in them and in yourself.
- If it means becoming the version of you who naturally attracts the kind of connection you want, you’re in the clear — and in your power.
Because the truth is, you can’t make someone love you, hire you, or text you back. But you can align yourself so fully with the experience you desire that the people who match it can’t help but show up.
And if you’re wondering what happens when you stop worrying about whether you’re “allowed” to manifest someone — and instead focus on becoming so magnetic that the right people feel like they chose you all along?
Well… that’s when the real magic starts.
Manifesting Freedom 
Leave a comment